MECE: Double the Usefulness
|
Dear Reader,
Many resources say your metrics trees need to be "MECE." But how do you do it?
MECE stands for:
Mutually
Exclusive
Collectively
Exhaustive
In the context of metrics trees, this means mapping the individual drivers of an overarching goal in a way that allows us to identify and improve domain-specific levers through selective focus, while creating holistic improvement.
Let's take the example of being an online micro coffee roasting brand (wild idea, right?).
A high-level metric could be Total Profit. Instead of jumping straight into (and getting lost) in various metrics that are easy to throw around, let's collect the driver categories first. There isn't one right way to create a MECE metrics tree. So, here's one starting point:
Sales Volume
Unit Economics
Coffee Quality
From here, we want to find one main representative metric for each category, and then connect its individual drivers (which could also each be broken down further).
Sales Volume: Represented by Number of Bags Sold, which could be driven by Number of Website Visitors and Conversion Rate.
Unit Economics: Represented by Average Margin per Bag Sold, which could be driven by Raw Material Purchase Price and Labor Cost.
Coffee Quality: Represented by Average Purchase Rating, which could be driven by Roasting Process Consistency Adherence and Average Bean Supplier Rating.
You could add more driver categories, like product variety or production volume. But I save these for the secret business plan in this daydream of mine. 🤫
Yes, you could also map these out into a long vertical correlating branch. But that can make levers to focus on getting buried quickly.
Now, here's the thing: Understanding MECE is one thing. Actually building metrics trees that drive real decisions in your organization, connecting them to your North Star Metrics, OKRs, and KPIs, is another.
That's exactly what I'm covering in my upcoming free metrics masterclass: "Use Real-Life Metrics Trees to Define NSMs, OKRs, and KPIs."
In 60 minutes, you'll learn:
📅 March 4th at 5:00 PM CET | 60 Minutes | Hands-on Live Cases | No Recording
| CLAIM YOUR FREE SPOT |
Thank you for Practicing Product,
Tim
As a Product Management Coach, I guide Product Teams to measure the real progress of their evidence-informed decisions.
I focus on better practices to connect the dots of Product Strategy, Product OKRs, and Product Discovery.
1 tip & 3 resources per week to improve your Strategy, OKRs, and Discovery practices in less than 5 minutes. Explore my new book on realprogressbook.com
Product Practice #429 Linked Better Practices over Stacked Best Practices PUBLISHED Oct 11, 2026 READ ON HERBIG.CO Meet Me Next Week at Just Product 2026 Get your Ticket Dear Reader, When a leadership team wants to introduce OKRs, it can be tempting to start by turning every bullet point of your strategy into an OKR. But a long list of priorities will still compete for the same time and attention, even when it gets repackaged. Before moving into OKR drafting, I like to work through this...
Product Practice #428 Linked Better Practices over Stacked Best Practices PUBLISHED Oct 5, 2026 READ ON HERBIG.CO Dear Reader, Sorry for the slip in sending this one out on Friday. To make up for it, there will be (for the first time ever) two newsletters going out this week. Recently, a CPO told me about an engineer who had used AI to develop a proposal. But when the decisions in it were questioned, the engineer kept referring him back to the output. The CPO wondered how that conversation...
Product Practice #427 Your Strategy names one audience; weak evidence describes another PUBLISHED Sep 24, 2026 READ ON HERBIG.CO Dear Reader, One of the most common questions that came up in my recent Strategy to Execution workshop at the ProductLab conference revolved around intentional strategic audiences vs. reactive chasing of new business. Many teams either operate where the company focuses on all customers of a given market (i.e., "all lawyers") or throw a wishful-thinking segment out...