4 Learnings from
|
​Dear Reader,​
During an ongoing long-term Discovery and Metrics Coaching engagement, I had the opportunity to meet many different external and internal-facing teams. One of this company’s focus points is the establishment of more metrics-informed decision-making, and they landed on North Star Metrics (NSMs) as a critical vehicle for that.
Here are my four key takeaways from considering and working on over 40 attempts to establish an NSM.
It’s crucial to avoid ambiguity when discussing a term like “North Star Metric” to ensure teams don’t develop 10+ different interpretations. Overcoming this is particularly challenging when all the shared examples are from a high-level, abstract company context.
In each of my sparring sessions, I revisited the context of what I meant when talking about a North Star Metric. This definition was aligned with the company’s product leadership, and it was not so much about the RIGHT definition as having the SAME across teams.
![]() |
Many of the teams I met were used to being measured by financials or other high-level metrics outside their Sphere of Influence. To deliberately pull them away from that rabbit hole, I always wanted to get a clear answer from them about who benefits from using their product. Since the idea was to have the NSM sit at the intersection of business and product metrics, we needed to establish that anchor first.
This also helped internal teams to understand who their customers were and what value they tried to create for them instead of getting lost in the end-end-end-customers' success.
The value of a North Star Metric is not so much in finding a shiny new object but in establishing the context and making sense of the metrics that already exist. Metrics trees were the most helpful approach for getting what was in people’s heads and on their dashboards into a helpful structure.
This way, the starting point was way more within reach instead of discussing a nice-sounding but abstract metric.
No amount of theorizing and approval discussions will tell you if you have the “right” NSM. It’s not about finding a metric that adheres to all the artificial definitions done by others (including me) but about a metric that helps prioritize. You’ll only know if an NSM is “right” if you start using it.
That’s why I established a semi-self-serve template walking teams through the most critical questions that should get them to a “Just Enough NSM”-state quickly and then focus on putting this metric into practice before iterating further and further.
Did you enjoy this one or have feedback? Do reply. It's motivating. I'm not a robot; I read and respond to every subscriber email I get (just ask around). If this newsletter isn't for you anymore, you can unsubscribe here.
Thank you for Practicing Product,
​Tim​
PS.: Part 3 of my "State of Discovery"-Poll is live on LinkedIn. This time, it's about screening interview participants.
What did you think of this week's newsletter?
As a Product Management Coach, I guide Product Teams to measure the progress of their evidence-informed decisions.
I identify and share the patterns among better practices to connect the dots of Product Strategy, Product OKRs, and Product Discovery.
1 tip & 3 resources per week to improve your Strategy, OKRs, and Discovery practices in less than 5 minutes.
Product Practice #332 Why you don’t get Value from your Product Strategy READ ON HERBIG.CO PUBLISHED Sep 6, 2024 READING TIME 4 min & 26 sec Dear Reader, It’s tempting to focus the start of your strategy creation on a framework or by-the-book advice. Have you filled out the canvas? Cool! Does it meet all the "Good Strategy" criteria? Great—let’s move on. But that’s a pattern of Alibi Progress: prioritizing technical correctness over everyday value. Whenever Product Strategy feels like a tick...
Product Practice #331 What does it taketo talk to customers? READ ON HERBIG.CO PUBLISHED Aug 30, 2024 READING TIME 4 min & 29 sec Dear Reader, Together with my friends at Orbital (a company I advise), I recently ran a LinkedIn poll about user interview behaviors. My goal was to get a rough overview of how product teams approach preparing customer interactions. Here’s what I learned from the 320 total votes: Who schedules your customer interviews? Most (55%) of participants schedule interviews...
Product Practice #330 The Problem with 0-1 Metrics READ ON HERBIG.CO PUBLISHED Aug 23, 2024 READING TIME 3 min & 51 sec Dear Reader, Scaling Product Discovery requires more than just having teams talk to more users. In fact, just having teams interview more users without structure and some baseline education might do more harm than good. Here’s what I took away from training over 30 product trios at The StepStone Group: #1 Educate Cross-functional, wherever possible It doesn’t make sense to...