How to Define Metrics
|
​Dear Reader,​
Most metrics examples focus on popular and external-facing products. Let's discuss how to define metrics for internal products.
I'm a fan of going back to the basics: Any metrics framework should help you measure value delivered to or changes created for whoever your audience is. And guess what? Even internal product teams have an audience: The fellow product, marketing, or sales teams their products serve.
Once that fundamental truth has sunk in, internal teams can also much easier understand that concepts like North Star Metrics or Lagging and Leading Indicators are contextual, not definitive. The Input Metric for one product's NSM could also be the (smaller-scale) NSM for another team. What's a leading indicator for one team can also be a lagging indicator for another team.
Let's assemble the pieces:
I once worked with a Product Manager who built a solution to enable internal product teams to ship their software. Zooming out, customer-related business metrics and user outcomes were tied to the shipped software, but these were multiple layers removed from this team's sphere of influence.
In our coaching Session, we sketched out a few potential metrics components for her work:
As a North Star Metric, you could set something like “The no. of bi-weekly well-packaged releases.” To quantify the NSM, one could use criteria like:
This NSM wouldn't directly contribute to external-facing business goals like ARR or Daily Active Users. However, enabling the efficient and reliable shipping of software has another business implication: It ensures that product teams have more capacity for impactful work. This means it can drive a product team's "Outcome ROI" and contribute to their velocity, which is very business-relevant since a product team is a company investment.
Working down from the NSM, the input metrics can be broken down further. The input metric “Share of Automated Test Coverage” changes due to metrics like:
To use just this one example, driving “% Automated Test Coverage among Cloud Teams” could become a periodic strategic focus for this team. This would allow them to draw inspiration from that part of the metrics tree to set their OKRs.
Alternatively, the prioritization and Discovery of this team should be guided by questions like
Exploring and answering these questions will provide them with more outcome-ish metrics they can connect to the overarching value they want to deliver.
​
Did you enjoy this one or have feedback? Do reply. It's motivating. I'm not a robot; I read and respond to every subscriber email I get (just ask around). If these emails aren't for you anymore, you can unsubscribe here.
Thank you for Practicing Product,
​Tim​
PS: My valued peer and good friend Tamer opened enrollment for the Spring Cohort of this Product Management Essentials Course. It is designed for Junior/Mid-level Product Managers to master the most essential yet hardest skills in modern product management.
Learn the strategies and tactics you need to use OKRs in a way that helps product teams prioritize work based on user problems and business goals—instead of replicating existing feature backlogs.
My Outcome OKRs for Product Teams Course enables product teams to use OKRs as a tool for decision-making in the context of Product Strategy, Product Discovery, and Scrum. Without the fluff, but with a focus on practicality in everyday work.
Learn more about my OKRs Course |
What did you think of this week's newsletter?
As a Product Management Coach, I guide Product Teams to measure the progress of their evidence-informed decisions.
I identify and share the patterns among better practices to connect the dots of Product Strategy, Product OKRs, and Product Discovery.
1 tip & 3 resources per week to improve your Strategy, OKRs, and Discovery practices in less than 5 minutes.
Product Practice #349 Why Your 'Correct' Discovery Method Might Be Wrong READ ON HERBIG.CO PUBLISHED Feb 7, 2025 READING TIME 3 min & 34 sec Dear Reader, "Which experiment should we run next?" This question comes up in almost every Discovery coaching session I facilitate. Teams often focus on finding the methodologically perfect way to test their assumptions. But here's the thing: the most technically correct experiment isn't always the right one to run. When choosing methods for Product...
Product Practice #348 In 2025, stop tryingto get better at OKRs READ ON HERBIG.CO PUBLISHED Jan 31, 2025 READING TIME 4 min & 04 sec Dear Reader, I hope you had the start of 2025 that you had wished and planned for. I'm excited to get back into the rhythm of weekly publishing, having completed my annual in-person workshop series and gearing up for continued (and new) client engagements. If you're up for it, reply to this newsletter and let me know what one thing you would like to see more (or...
This is the last newsletter before my annual writing break for the holidays. After this issue, I will return to your inboxes on January 31, 2025. Product Practice #347 My 2024 Annual Review READ ON HERBIG.CO PUBLISHED Dec 20, 2024 READING TIME 5 min & 28 sec Dear Reader, What I focused on in the second half of 2024 After wrapping up the first half of 2024, the rest of the year was full of highlights. Stepping on stage at Product at Heart. Besides the book, this talk was probably the most...