Why Your 'Correct' Discovery Method Might Be Wrong


Why Your 'Correct' Discovery Method Might Be Wrong

READ ON

HERBIG.CO

PUBLISHED

Feb 7, 2025

READING TIME

3 min & 34 sec

​Dear Reader,​

"Which experiment should we run next?"

This question comes up in almost every Discovery coaching session I facilitate. Teams often focus on finding the methodologically perfect way to test their assumptions. But here's the thing: the most technically correct experiment isn't always the right one to run.

When choosing methods for Product Discovery, we often focus on what fits our research question or assumption best. Say you want to understand how users perceive features in your product.

A diary study might be the perfect method—capturing real usage patterns over time. But what if it takes three months to get reliable insights? A series of well-structured interviews or shadowing sessions might get you 80% of the way there in just two weeks.

Several factors determine your lead time to insight:

  • Your team's skills and capabilities
  • Industry context and constraints
  • Available infrastructure
  • Customer interaction patterns
  • Product characteristics

Here's another way to think about it: An A/B test might seem quick to start—taking just hours or days to implement. But depending on your traffic and conversion rates, it could take weeks or months to reach statistical significance. In contrast, while recruiting participants for qualitative interviews might take two weeks, you could have reliable insights within days of completing them.

Neither method is inherently better. What matters is the total time to reliable insight, not just how quickly you can get started.

So, when picking your next Discovery priority, ask yourself:

  1. How well does the method answer our research question?
  2. How technically correct is the method for our needs?
  3. What's our lead time to the next viable insight?

Here's a practical tip: When evaluating lead time, avoid abstract scoring systems. Instead, estimate the actual duration by adding:

  • Setup time (recruiting, preparation)
  • Execution time (running the experiment)
  • Synthesis time (analyzing and learning)

This concrete timeline helps you make practical trade-offs between methods.

Remember: The goal isn't to achieve perfect certainty. It's to reduce uncertainty enough to make confident decisions about what to build next.

1 Question For You To Put This Into Practice

Look at your current Discovery priorities: Which assumption could you test differently if you optimized for lead time to insight instead of methodological correctness?

Reply and let me know your answer.

Did you enjoy the newsletter? Please forward it. It only takes two clicks. Creating this one took two hours.

Thank you for Practicing Product,

Tim

Good News!

Some last tickets are available for my in-person Product Discovery workshop on March 10 in London (as part of Mind the Product conference).

Content I found Practical This Week

Product Discovery Should Speed Up Delivery, NOT Slow it Down

Now imagine a team that is responsible for both discovery and delivery. They have learned the hard way how critical it is to have those developing the product involved in discovery. This is easy for them to do too because they’re part of the same team! This immediately does two things: Kills off handoffs. Empowers those delivering the work with key context. This significantly reduces the time the team has to stop during delivery to clarify things.

Not everyone needs to be talking to customers

The idea that we should involve everyone in everything is appealing when we don't know how to collaborate. It's like pulling everyone into a meeting. Nobody knew how to break the problem apart, so now twenty people are sitting around the table. Putting everybody in one room is the lowest denominator of collaboration. Same with asking everyone to take part in the same work.

Guide to determine the first version of a new product or feature at Eventbrite

Experiment: An Experiment is an investigation into the casual relationship between two things. In some cases, you can ship an experiment without actually delivering value to customers.

MVP: An MVP is all about delivering value to users by building the smallest product you can to test a hypothesis. You ship to learn, which influences future product development.

MVF (Minimum Viable Feature): Similar to an MVP but instead of testing strategy-related assumptions on a product level, an MVF tests solution-specific ideas on top of an existing product.

Phased Development : You know exactly what you need to build, and you break that down into smaller phases over longer sprints.

Who is Tim Herbig?

As a Product Management Coach, I guide Product Teams to measure the real progress of their evidence-informed decisions.

I focus on better practices to connect the dots of Product Strategy, Product OKRs, and Product Discovery.

Product Practice Newsletter

1 tip & 3 resources per week to improve your Strategy, OKRs, and Discovery practices in less than 5 minutes.

Read more from Product Practice Newsletter

Product Practice #369 Product Discovery Triangulation READ ON HERBIG.CO PUBLISHED Jun 29, 2025 READING TIME 4 min & 47 sec Dear Reader, To get to an informed conviction through Product Discovery, product teams often need to be creative. It can be challenging for Product Discovery collaborators to make real progress, especially when they lack an environment that provides the right amount of guidance without being too constraining for Adaptable Product Discovery.That’s why today’s newsletter is...

Product Practice #368 How a Product Vision Board saved my Strategy READ ON HERBIG.CO PUBLISHED Jun 20, 2025 READING TIME 3 min & 53 sec Dear Reader, I once led a newly formed product team that aimed to develop a product to increase the monetization of a specific user segment. I co-led a long Discovery effort that validated and scoped this product. At one point during our Delivery journey, my boss approached the team while I was on leave and asked them what they were trying to accomplish....

Product Practice #367 3 Prompts to help TeamsGo from KPIs to OKRs READ ON HERBIG.CO PUBLISHED Jun 13, 2025 READING TIME 3 min & 56 sec Dear Reader, In theory, distinguishing KPIs from OKRs should be simple. KPIs are reactive metrics you monitor, but only act on when they exceed or drop below a certain threshold. Think revenue or conversion rate. Objectives and Key Results (OKRs) contain proactive metrics that help you measure your progress towards strategic priorities. Consider revenue from a...