🛠️ How to predict the future of your OKRs (and why it matters)


How to predict the future of your OKRs (and why it matters)

READ ON

​HERBIG.CO​

PUBLISHED

Oct 25, 2024

READING TIME

3 min & 32 sec

​Dear Reader,​

Ever sat in an OKR review meeting feeling like you're just going through the motions or reporting without meaning? You're not alone. As a Head of Product, I've been there too. But what if I told you there's a way to make your OKRs truly useful for decision-making? Let's dive in.

The power of predicting the future

One of my favorite ways of helping teams pressure-test their OKRs is by trying to predict the future. I want them to think about the answer to “Imagine a check-in 4 weeks down the road. With whom will you look at these OKRs and discussion emerges from looking at the changed values and confidence?”

This is similar to a premortem exercise. By predicting the future, teams can anticipate how useful their OKRs are for making decisions.

Why typical OKRs fail the "check-in-ability" test

Let’s use one of the first (documented) KRs I wrote as a Head of Product 6+ years (don’t judge me):

KR1: Understand 'feature' map of product status quo and compare with user expectations.

KR2: Develop design guiding principles for product simplification.

Imagine a check-in four weeks down the road:

A: “How are we doing on KR1?”

B: “I think we better understood the feature map.”

A: “Ok, by how much?”

B: “I think would put the confidence at 80%".”

A: “But…why?”

B: “Because it still feels on track.”

A: “And KR2?”

B. “We have scheduled a first meeting to discuss the design guiding principles. So, I estimate the progress to be about 20%.”

A: “Will you do anything differently based on the progress of these KRs?“

B: “No, I think everything works according to plan.”

A:

How would you rate the check-in-ability of these KRs? Spoiler: NOT GREAT. They can neither demonstrate real progress nor guide a conversation about priorities.

But fixing KRs like these by just adding numbers would be too short-sighted. After all, how check-in-able is a KR with a number, if you can’t influence it, if it’s too lagging, or if it’s a generic KPI?

Predicting the future of your OKRs isn't about being psychic. It's about understanding what they will help you do differently later, so they can be more useful now.

HOW TO PUT THIS THEORY INTO PRACTICE

  • Be clear on what OKRs should do for you. Articulate what change OKRs should create for whom? Is this primarily a reporting exercise or an actual prioritization tool for the team?
  • Role-play a check-in. How would the conversations of a check-in for this OKR go? Would there be meaningful conversations or just nodding in agreement as you blaze through the numbers?
  • Change the attributes. Which attribute is missing from your OKRs to make them more check-in-able? Do you need more precise numbers? Do the KRs need to be more leading? Do you need a more influenceable metric?

Did you enjoy this one or have feedback? Do reply. It's motivating. I'm not a robot; I read and respond to every subscriber email I get (just ask around). If this newsletter isn't for you anymore, you can unsubscribe here.

Thank you for Practicing Product,

​Tim​

Content I found Practical This Week

How to Set Effective Quarterly Goals and OKRs for Platform Engineering Teams: A Practical Guide

Once OKRs are agreed on, the initial problems they relate to, and the groupings, will lead to some high-level features or initiatives. Each initiative can then be refined further with the teams to identify the work that needs to be done, and how it might be broken down into small increments to develop and ship (in the example, you can see how it would link to a sprint planning priority and sprint goal).

The #1 Reason Why Most OKRs Suck!

video preview​

How to track slow-moving OKRs

But if your lagging indicators are moving slowly (ex: you close 1 or 2 customers per quarter), then you should opt for leading indicators instead. You’ll need to find the best metrics that can help you not only assess your confidence, but also help you understand how to adjust your strategy. Using lagging metrics can sometimes feel like more art than science, but the key is to have something that can be observed on a weekly basis.

What did you think of this week's newsletter?

Who is Tim Herbig?

As a Product Management Coach, I guide Product Teams to measure the real progress of their evidence-informed decisions.

I focus on better practices to connect the dots of Product Strategy, Product OKRs, and Product Discovery.

Enjoy the newsletter? Please forward it. It only takes 2 clicks. Coming up with this one took 2 hours.

Product Practice Newsletter

1 tip & 3 resources per week to improve your Strategy, OKRs, and Discovery practices in less than 5 minutes. Explore my new book on realprogressbook.com

Read more from Product Practice Newsletter

Product Practice #397 3 Things to Put into YourNext Strategy Document PUBLISHED Feb 27, 2026 READ ON HERBIG.CO Dear Reader, The most effective strategy document I've seen doesn't worry about the looks or format. Whether it's a scrappy Google Doc or a fancy Miro template, what matters is the quality and cohesiveness of the information it contains. Make sure what you cover aligns with your company's expected standards to ensure stakeholder understanding and, consequently, buy-in. But make sure...

Hallo liebe:r Leser:in, English Translation below for internal forwarding to your German colleagues Du lieferst Features aus und wirst nach KPIs gefragt – ohne Verbindung zu Erfolg für Nutzer:innen und Geschäft. Die Strategie deines Unternehmens ist entweder zu vage oder fehlt ganz. Das Ergebnis: Alibi Progress statt echter Wirkung.In meinem Workshop "Strategische Umsetzung statt KPIs abarbeiten – Entwicklung & Messung von Produktstrategie am 4. Mai im Rahmen der Product Owner Days 2026...

Product Practice #396 MECE: Double the Usefulnessof Your Metrics Trees PUBLISHED Feb 19, 2026 READ ON HERBIG.CO Dear Reader, Many resources say your metrics trees need to be "MECE." But how do you do it? MECE stands for: Mutually Exclusive Collectively Exhaustive In the context of metrics trees, this means mapping the individual drivers of an overarching goal in a way that allows us to identify and improve domain-specific levers through selective focus, while creating holistic...