What does it take
|
Dear Reader,
Together with my friends at Orbital (a company I advise), I recently ran a LinkedIn poll about user interview behaviors. My goal was to get a rough overview of how product teams approach preparing customer interactions.
Here’s what I learned from the 320 total votes:
Most (55%) of participants schedule interviews themselves, which indicates the healthy democratization of research access to scale Discovery in companies. While it requires the right skills and tooling, I have seen many situations where enabling a product team to recruit themselves simply reduces friction. And it creates the capacity for roles like user researchers to focus on the big rocks.
But do teams get the access they need? What's the point of being able to do your research when it takes you ages to get to the next reliable insight? 53% of participants shared that setting up their last five interviews took less than two weeks. Depending on the quality of the participants (and, consequently, insights), this feels good enough. Faster is often better, but you sacrifice interviewee quality for an artificial cadence.
Speaking of which, How do teams ensure they talk to the right people? Product Analytics data (38%) and Screener responses (32%) are the go-to qualifiers for the participants of this poll. This is probably the result of a team's context: The former depends on the available tooling and interview infrastructure, and the latter "only" requires skills to craft revealing screener questions.
Lucky for you, Orbital can help you in these three areas.
Disclaimer: I see the scientific shortcomings of LI survey data and the potential skewing of results. It's one valuable (and, frankly, fun) data point.
Did you enjoy this one or have feedback? Do reply. It's motivating. I'm not a robot; I read and respond to every subscriber email I get (just ask around). If this newsletter isn't for you anymore, you can unsubscribe here.
Thank you for Practicing Product,
Tim
Learn how I helped companies like Deutsche Telekom and Forto hone their Product Discovery practices. I closely work with product organizations through workshops and coaching to introduce and adapt Product Discovery.
| Learn more about my Discovery Consulting |
What did you think of this week's newsletter?
As a Product Management Coach, I guide Product Teams to measure the real progress of their evidence-informed decisions.
I focus on better practices to connect the dots of Product Strategy, Product OKRs, and Product Discovery.
1 tip & 3 resources per week to improve your Strategy, OKRs, and Discovery practices in less than 5 minutes. Explore my new book on realprogressbook.com
Product Practice #430 How to Think About Product Strategy in the Age of AI PUBLISHED Oct 16, 2026 READ ON HERBIG.CO Dear Reader, Two weeks ago, I had the incredible opportunity to be on Akash's Product Growth Podcast. Now that the episode is out, I can finally share it with you as well. I typically don't put podcast episodes front and center in this newsletter, but since this is more of a 1-hour AI Product Strategy Masterclass than an audio-only podcast, I think it's one of the best pieces of...
Product Practice #429 Linked Better Practices over Stacked Best Practices PUBLISHED Oct 11, 2026 READ ON HERBIG.CO Meet Me Next Week at Just Product 2026 Get your Ticket Dear Reader, When a leadership team wants to introduce OKRs, it can be tempting to start by turning every bullet point of your strategy into an OKR. But a long list of priorities will still compete for the same time and attention, even when it gets repackaged. Before moving into OKR drafting, I like to work through this...
Product Practice #428 Linked Better Practices over Stacked Best Practices PUBLISHED Oct 5, 2026 READ ON HERBIG.CO Dear Reader, Sorry for the slip in sending this one out on Friday. To make up for it, there will be (for the first time ever) two newsletters going out this week. Recently, a CPO told me about an engineer who had used AI to develop a proposal. But when the decisions in it were questioned, the engineer kept referring him back to the output. The CPO wondered how that conversation...