The Problem with 0-1 Metrics​Dear Reader,​ Welcome back! I hope you had (or still have) a relaxed or eventful (whatever your preference is) summer. I enjoyed the time off and being in places that filled me up. Among others, the baltic see. Which is where I captured one of my favorite summer shots: Before we jump into today's issue, I want to share three things from friends that I believe you should be aware of:
Let's get into this week's issue. ​​Outcomes over Outputs, but not at all cost​: It’s a powerful shift for product teams to use measurable changes in customer behavior (aka Outcomes) to prioritize work and measure progress. However, if that progress takes weeks or months to detect, these metrics are not as helpful as they should be. ​​As Ravi Mehta once said​, “The right goal depends on the team's understanding of what it is trying to accomplish.“ Whether a product team creates a new solution within a company or a newly founded startup, Measuring progress when you don’t have customer signals out of the gate can feel foggy. While you’re on your way toward improving customer behaviors, the feedback loops for your actions are simply not there. There’s not much to check in on a metric that hasn’t moved and, you know, won’t move for months. 0-1 efforts require more pragmatic Output or even Input metrics to measure your progress. Let’s look at an example: An analytics software wants to offer split testing functionality to increase the share of wallet and time spent with existing customers. The outcome to aim for would be the number of started or completed split tests by existing customers. But that metric would only begin to be measurable once the functionality is rolled out to a significant number of customers​—it’s lagging​ to help the team working on this initiative see if they’re on track. The team has to derive influenceable goals throughout the different stages of getting there. Did you enjoy this one or have feedback? Do reply. It's motivating. I'm not a robot; I read and respond to every subscriber email I get (ask around). If this newsletter isn't for you anymore, you can unsubscribe here. Thank you for Practicing Product, ​Tim​ Join my In-Person Workshops in BerlinI'm excited to bring my beloved in-person workshops back to Berlin in January 2025. You can choose between 1-day workshops on Product Strategy, Product OKRs, or Product Discovery OR get the full 3-day experience for you or your team.
(early bird pricing is available until Sep 21) What did you think of this week's newsletter? As a Product Management Coach, I guide Product Teams to measure the real progress of their evidence-informed decisions. I focus on better practices to connect the dots of Product Strategy, Product OKRs, and Product Discovery. |
1 tip & 3 resources per week to improve your Strategy, OKRs, and Discovery practices in less than 5 minutes. Explore my new book on realprogressbook.com
Hallo liebe:r Leser:in, English Translation below for internal forwarding to your German colleagues Du lieferst Features aus und wirst nach KPIs gefragt – ohne Verbindung zu Erfolg für Nutzer:innen und Geschäft. Die Strategie deines Unternehmens ist entweder zu vage oder fehlt ganz. Das Ergebnis: Alibi Progress statt echter Wirkung.In meinem Workshop "Strategische Umsetzung statt KPIs abarbeiten – Entwicklung & Messung von Produktstrategie am 4. Mai im Rahmen der Product Owner Days 2026...
Product Practice #396 MECE: Double the Usefulnessof Your Metrics Trees PUBLISHED Feb 19, 2026 READ ON HERBIG.CO Dear Reader, Many resources say your metrics trees need to be "MECE." But how do you do it? MECE stands for: Mutually Exclusive Collectively Exhaustive In the context of metrics trees, this means mapping the individual drivers of an overarching goal in a way that allows us to identify and improve domain-specific levers through selective focus, while creating holistic...
Product Practice #395 How it feels being Interviewed by AI PUBLISHED Feb 13, 2026 READ ON HERBIG.CO Dear Reader, Last week, I invited you to join an AI-led concept test of a side project idea. Here's what participants share with me about their experience: "It was like getting interviewed by someone who is doing this one of the first times." "I felt free to say what I wanted without 'hurting' the interviewers. I felt listened (as the AI was repeating my points). But sometimes the conversation...